Discussion Forum

Forum >> Discussions >> Draft #4 2024  

Post ID	Date & Time	Game Date	Function
#20990	07/11/2015 2:33:18 pm		Ignore
JuanCarlos_BY Joined: 12/22/2014 Posts: 77 Inactive	Post tittle says Draft #4, but the player’s page says: Drafted round 5 by… Then is it Draft #4 or Draft #5?
#20992	07/11/2015 2:51:27 pm		Ignore
Tiger504 Joined: 06/17/2014 Posts: 1314 Kalamazoo Bloody Tigers III.4	Its draft 4.
#20993	07/11/2015 2:54:50 pm		Ignore
garfscores Joined: 10/13/2014 Posts: 488 Battle Creek Sting IV.7	Five. If you do what's right and move draft ten to the first day of the new season, which I specifically asked if I should do and was told no by some either not nice or dumb forum posters
#20999	07/11/2015 7:02:18 pm		Ignore
Seca Joined: 05/05/2014 Posts: 5199 Waterloo Dinosaurs Legends	I was in Europe visiting family this past week. Went International pool for the first time thinking it might be fated. Won't be dipping in that pool again for a long while. Updated Saturday, July 11 2015 @ 7:44:59 pm PDT
#21009	07/11/2015 11:41:50 pm		Ignore
MukilteoMike Joined: 08/09/2014 Posts: 3294 Inactive	I'm tired of drafting "good" 11 potential players. The scouting reports are too vague and misleading. Why anyone likes rewarding pure dumb luck is beyond me.
#21025	07/12/2015 11:51:03 am		Ignore
Endrju Joined: 05/28/2015 Posts: 577 Inactive	This time around I only got 1 pitcher with "He will always be wild" scouting report. So I had to pick a hitter. None of them looked good, so I made a gamble for a future DH, picked up this guy. Can any of you more experienced managers give me ia hint? I suppose he's a keeper, he could be a good DH/catcher even with that low potential, as skill points should go into hitting and power.
#21027	07/12/2015 12:36:18 pm		Ignore
Favuz Joined: 02/26/2014 Posts: 638 Oxnard Sunsets IV.3	He will not walk a lot, but he should be a decent catcher. If you don't have better prospect at C, he looks like a keeper to me.
#21030	07/12/2015 1:56:22 pm		Ignore
Rock777 Joined: 09/21/2014 Posts: 9596 Haverhill Halflings III.1	MukilteoMike - Rios was good. Low stamina, reasonable defensive stats, and a couple nice scouted ratings. If you picked up a "Good" POT 12 he would have had more stamina or defensive ratings. Your last draft pick looked even better (and a POT 12), but I see you considered him underdeveloped. The problem is you are looking for Very Good right now and they don't show up so often. I haven't kept a draft pick all season. Updated Sunday, July 12 2015 @ 1:59:28 pm PDT
#21032	07/12/2015 3:07:26 pm		Ignore
MukilteoMike Joined: 08/09/2014 Posts: 3294 Inactive	Rock, I think you must have looked at a guy I picked up on waivers; my last three draftees were all 11 potential guys. Relievers need to be more than borderline guys to not get cut. I'm not going to spend four years on a marginal arm hoping he can be a specialist.
#21033	07/12/2015 3:32:41 pm		Ignore
Rock777 Joined: 09/21/2014 Posts: 9596 Haverhill Halflings III.1	Oh yeah you picked him up on waivers and then dropped him right away. I'm not arguing that you shouldn't have dropped him. Just saying that is a "Good" player. And at this point in your game you really want "Very Good" players. A "Good" 12 isn't going to be any better than a "Good" 11.

| |

Reply