Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#59843 | 07/13/2018 11:13:39 am | Oct 8th, 2036 | |
michaeltodd2 Joined: 02/20/2018 Posts: 325 Paradise Valley Cubs II.2 | If i have two players to choose from, and they both have the same crummy descriptions, but one has "He has above average potential" at the end, and the other nothing...i should take the above average rating. Correct? I mean i realize the one with nothing at the end could be better, but in terms of hierarchy, that's what one should do? Thank you. | ||
#59845 | 07/13/2018 12:01:40 pm | Oct 8th, 2036 | |
lostraven Joined: 07/02/2016 Posts: 1269 Corvallis Ravens II.1 | This is the bullet list I go by personally, backed up by my own research:
Edit: The comment in parentheses about being exceedingly rare means that the combination is rare, e.g., a player with "above average" that also reveals a 13 POT. (Not that a 13 POT is rare in and of itself. However, as most of us know, the 15 POT aren't exactly plentiful, and 7 and 17 POT players are indeed rare in general.) Updated Friday, July 13 2018 @ 12:08:19 pm PDT |
||
#59847 | 07/13/2018 12:51:58 pm | Oct 8th, 2036 | |
michaeltodd2 Joined: 02/20/2018 Posts: 325 Paradise Valley Cubs II.2 | That's exactly what i needed...thank you! |