Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#56846 | 12/19/2017 10:17:29 am | Oct 24th, 2034 | |
xLee227 Joined: 07/06/2015 Posts: 269 Inactive | What position would you train Bloom at? Some background: - I have a ton of outfielders in my minors, and don't have a single player being trained at SS/2B/3B outside of AAA (SS in particular is a problem as I only have a soon-to-graduate 25 year old in my entire system who's qualified to play the position) - Started with him at SS hoping his 16 Range/20 Arm could overcome not having any positive defensive scouting but he struggled a lot (.877 Fielding, 41 errors!) and I started second-guessing having a SS without positive defensive scouting given the fielding struggles of Alexander on my ML roster - I then decided to try Bloom at C with his 20 arm but he only caught 20% stealing, although it is a relatively small sample size of just 6/30 attempts - He's currently only trained at OF, but has 77 games at SS and 30 at C Should I just keep him the OF, where his build would be best suited despite my lack of infield depth? Or should I stick it out at SS despite his lack of positive fielding scouting? Or put him behind the plate despite his 16 range and poor caught stealing percentage? Or maybe another position entirely, such as 3B? |
||
#56849 | 12/19/2017 10:43:47 am | Oct 24th, 2034 | |
JJNZ Joined: 12/09/2014 Posts: 1580 Yakima Monster III.3 | I'd be inclined to throw him at 3rd if he's not going to be in the OF for you, he'd also be great at C but I feel that 16 range would be a bit wasted - great as a back up C who can spell your regular guy though? | ||
#56850 | 12/19/2017 10:51:46 am | Oct 24th, 2034 | |
Seca Joined: 05/05/2014 Posts: 5194 Waterloo Dinosaurs Legends | I would do SS or 3B. Whichever is the greatest area of need. As you said, he's best suited to the OF (where he would be an elite RF). Tho he doesn't have fielding scouting, with 15 potential I think its possible he reaches 12-13 anyway. This is less than ideal at both SS and 3B, but should be playable. (As a switch hitter, may be he ultimately ends up playing OF vs. 1 hand of pitcher and infield vs. the other to make your platoons work.) |
||
#56851 | 12/19/2017 12:05:51 pm | Oct 24th, 2034 | |
wickersty Joined: 05/11/2017 Posts: 1002 Deadwood Perambulators II.1 | If I had him, with my Turf stadium, I'd train him at 3B | ||
#56855 | 12/19/2017 2:01:06 pm | Oct 24th, 2034 | |
Rock777 Joined: 09/21/2014 Posts: 9571 Haverhill Halflings III.1 | Definitely depends on projected need. I would be leery about putting an unknown glove at SS. Range might be wasted at C, but that arm is very nice. I'd probably go C myself. I'd go 3B before going SS. Can always fall back to CF if nothing else. EDIT: I wouldn't stress about the FPC or the CS%. A lot of that can be attributed to have very little position experience currently at SS and C. Updated Tuesday, December 19 2017 @ 2:04:23 pm PST |
||
#56864 | 12/19/2017 3:26:45 pm | Oct 28th, 2034 | |
amalric7 Joined: 01/20/2016 Posts: 2235 New York Lancers IV.2 | Absolutely agree with Rock, that's exactly my approach. SS is a no-no, and an elite arm behind the plate is worth its weight in gold. C then 3B for me, CF/RF as a backup plan as he already has full OF eligibility. | ||
#56866 | 12/19/2017 3:38:10 pm | Oct 28th, 2034 | |
AssumedPseudonym Joined: 10/26/2016 Posts: 1130 Deerfield Beach Rats V.7 | Without a defensive report, I wouldn’t even consider him for SS or 3B. The arm definitely looks sexy behind the plate, but with that range I’d be tempted a lot more toward CF or RF. | ||
#56872 | 12/19/2017 5:28:40 pm | Oct 28th, 2034 | |
Mcdoogle Joined: 05/21/2015 Posts: 243 Inactive | I'd train him C/OF, i'd kill for an arm like that behind the plate. |