Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#45289 | 02/15/2017 10:20:06 am | ||
Tiger504 Joined: 06/17/2014 Posts: 1314 Kalamazoo Bloody Tigers III.4 | Based on his solid fielding scouting, somewhere between 12 and 15? He is certainly worth developing in my opinion. |
||
#45290 | 02/15/2017 10:20:18 am | ||
Philliesworld Joined: 10/17/2014 Posts: 786 Pierre Jacobins III.3 | He'll probably end up with 11-13 in fielding. | ||
#45291 | 02/15/2017 10:22:12 am | ||
Philliesworld Joined: 10/17/2014 Posts: 786 Pierre Jacobins III.3 | I based mine off of how many skill points he has left, which fits into the solid fielding report. Updated Wednesday, February 15 2017 @ 10:22:32 am PST |
||
#45292 | 02/15/2017 10:29:34 am | ||
RDailey1948 Joined: 12/29/2016 Posts: 147 Inactive | Thanks! I guess I hit the jackpot here. | ||
#45294 | 02/15/2017 10:45:15 am | ||
Philliesworld Joined: 10/17/2014 Posts: 786 Pierre Jacobins III.3 | Here's my entire breakdown on him. At 67 skill index, 12 potential. He has at the the max 36 more skill points to gain. Lets say he gains 35 for simplicitys sake.(he probably will seeing how young he is) Divide 35 by 5(the number of skills he's developing)=7 add 7 to Hitting, Bat Control, Plate discipline, Power, and fielding. H-14 BC-11 PD-9 P-9 F-12 But it's says he's a great hitter. 14 hitting is not a great hitter. He'll probably train slightly slower on power, Plate discipline, and bat control. Take one skill point away from each of those three, then add 3 points to Hitting. The reason I'm not taking away from fielding is because 12 fielding matches a solid fielder report. This should be the final breakdown. H-17 BC-10 PD-8 P-8 F-12 +speed, range, and arm=102 skill index. Right below a 12 potentials max. Updated Wednesday, February 15 2017 @ 10:46:34 am PST |
||
#45295 | 02/15/2017 10:55:28 am | ||
RDailey1948 Joined: 12/29/2016 Posts: 147 Inactive | thanks Philliesworld, I think he would work well at SS. I'll keep your analysis in mind. I need to find that SI to Pot breakdown and the average, above average and good definitions. Updated Wednesday, February 15 2017 @ 10:59:36 am PST |
||
#45296 | 02/15/2017 11:17:23 am | ||
Deuce Joined: 06/07/2016 Posts: 279 New London Rippers V.3 | http://brokenbat.org/forum/2/3/2451 There is good chart here. If you don't see it just flip through a couple of pages on the thred |
||
#45297 | 02/15/2017 11:41:38 am | ||
Philliesworld Joined: 10/17/2014 Posts: 786 Pierre Jacobins III.3 | http://brokenbat.org/forum/0/3/4580 Here's a good thread. You'll have to go to the start to see the chart rock77 put together. |
||
#45299 | 02/15/2017 11:48:31 am | ||
RDailey1948 Joined: 12/29/2016 Posts: 147 Inactive | Deuce, thanks, that is quite helpful! Thanks to Rock777 for the original post too. Oops, I see Phillie sent me too, thanks. Updated Wednesday, February 15 2017 @ 11:55:54 am PST |
||
#45352 | 02/16/2017 3:33:42 am | ||
amalric7 Joined: 01/20/2016 Posts: 2236 New York Lancers V.4 | On the other hand, Luque might max out at 96 SI (the minimum for a 12 POT) - don't assume every player will reach their limit, because many won't. 100 SI might be a better estimate. If you go with 100 SI, he could breakdown as follows:- 17/12/8/8/12/19/13 Great hitting is more often 18-20 than 17-20, and solid fielding more often 13-15 as opposed to 12-15, which could mean something like this:- 18/11/7/7/14/19/13 That's still a serviceable player at SS or 2B, I'd just temper expectations a little. |