Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#9412 | 08/15/2014 1:58:00 pm | ||
arsenalgunners Joined: 08/15/2013 Posts: 37 Inactive | I know that SI isn't a hugely important statistic but I was just wondering how to know if my player is relatively good for his age. Personally I always think about it as this. 18 years-55 19 years-60 20-65 21-70 22-75 23-80 24-85 25-90 26-95 27-100 etc. Is that reasonable? |
||
#9416 | 08/15/2014 2:12:44 pm | ||
admin Joined: 01/27/2010 Posts: 4985 Administrator | Hmmm....I think you'd probably like most of your players to peak around 26 or ealier. Not sure everyone is going to get to 90's and 100's also. Steve |
||
#9419 | 08/15/2014 2:19:15 pm | ||
Haselrig Joined: 04/13/2014 Posts: 2790 Novi Doubledays III.4 | My working theory is to go off of potential squares. 12 potential squares should get you a player with 100 SI as long as he develops properly. Every potential square is worth about eight and one third SI. If it turns out that is the case, a 13 potential guy should top out around 108, 14 should be around 116 etc. |