Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#7136 | 04/04/2014 2:23:17 pm | ||
Edmund Blackadder Joined: 03/18/2014 Posts: 21 Inactive | Since we have limited minor league roster spots, is there any reason to keep players with less than very good potential? Why settle for less than the best? I can see that if a player has very good notes that maybe he is really very good and not good, but other than that? |
||
#7137 | 04/04/2014 3:57:19 pm | ||
admin Joined: 01/27/2010 Posts: 4980 Administrator | It all depends on who else you have in your minor league system. If you're collective roster is near the 50 player limit, then I would start dropping the players with the least potential or that had some other issues. Steve |
||
#7138 | 04/04/2014 3:59:21 pm | ||
Krakonico Joined: 01/04/2013 Posts: 312 Inactive | Those "very good" are rare, not everyday you get one. And look at him: http://brokenbat.org/player/60268 he has "above average" potential, but is one of the best closers of the league. | ||
#7141 | 04/05/2014 1:04:52 am | ||
thebuzz Joined: 12/24/2013 Posts: 59 Inactive | Are we to assume that there is no nepotism or agent influence involved in the scouting reports? That the scouting community is providing accurate and completely unbiased information? When scouting reports on Rookie League players come in at good this, or good that, and the players skill level is at O for that skill, I have to wonder what hat the scout pulled that out of. Actually I wonder how a player with a 0 skill level, and some with two or even three 0, can even be considered a prospect. Maybe it's time to be able to hire your own team scout, perhaps even with small fee involved, that can assist your team. |
||
#7142 | 04/05/2014 2:12:16 am | ||
Mig2012 Joined: 09/26/2012 Posts: 547 Inactive | And then everyone would hire those scouts. What would be the point? |