Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#57006 | 02/19/2018 8:16:51 am | Jan 15th, 2035 | |
terryhumphreys Joined: 01/20/2014 Posts: 103 Athens Gold IV.5 | allow teams with finances below zero to compete for minimum salary players (.20 million) on waivers. |
||
#57063 | 02/19/2018 4:57:27 pm | Jan 15th, 2035 | |
Rock777 Joined: 09/21/2014 Posts: 9597 Haverhill Halflings III.1 | +1 | ||
#57087 | 02/20/2018 2:12:18 am | Jan 15th, 2035 | |
dlwarren1 Joined: 06/21/2017 Posts: 39 Saginaw Crusaders VI.23 | -1 | ||
#57107 | 02/20/2018 10:30:13 am | Jan 15th, 2035 | |
Rock777 Joined: 09/21/2014 Posts: 9597 Haverhill Halflings III.1 | Why negative? What is the down side of this? A team can't cut its expensive players without having cheap players to replace them with. Currently the game doesn't allow you to hire new players if you are in financial trouble, but also doesn't allow you to cut players below a minimum, so it prevents people from righting the ship... | ||
#57108 | 02/20/2018 11:25:13 am | Jan 15th, 2035 | |
Bridger Joined: 08/04/2016 Posts: 264 Muncie Flyers III.4 | +1 There should be a path to recovery for mismanaged franchises. |
||
#57115 | 02/20/2018 1:48:02 pm | Jan 15th, 2035 | |
AssumedPseudonym Joined: 10/26/2016 Posts: 1130 Deerfield Beach Rats V.7 | I disagree with being able to sign only $0.20M players. Bump that up to half-a-million and then we’re talking. The only players who earn less than $0.50M are minor league players, so you’d be damning the team to looking for either players who aren’t ready for the bigs or underdeveloped players who never went anywhere on other teams. That’s not righting the ship, that’s ensuring complete lack of competitive play from the ballclub. Since you’d have to promote them to the Majors to play them, they’re already guaranteed to be earning $0.50M, so why not just raise the limit to what they’d be earning anyway? At least that way they’d have a shot at finding under-the-radar guys who could actually be more useful than trotting Larry, Curly, Shemp, and Moe out onto the field. (I speak from some experience, too. My first few seasons were run on a shoestring budget, and I got surprisingly good mileage out of some $500K guys.) Updated Tuesday, February 20 2018 @ 1:49:05 pm PST |
||
#57124 | 02/20/2018 4:50:09 pm | Jan 20th, 2035 | |
Philliesworld Joined: 10/17/2014 Posts: 787 Pierre Jacobins III.3 | +1 | ||
#57210 | 02/23/2018 9:33:07 am | Feb 19th, 2035 | |
Cactusguy21 Joined: 07/25/2017 Posts: 815 Presque Isle Vikings III.4 | +1, even though I don't know what it's like to be low on salary :p | ||
#57272 | 02/24/2018 5:43:28 pm | Mar 4th, 2035 | |
munciestan Joined: 12/26/2016 Posts: 33 Walnut Creek Cardinals IV.1 | Makes sense to me. You can't reduce salary to get back on top of your finances and not be able to sign new players. Would have to include players up to $0.50M. So what would you do otherwise, just give up the team and request another one? |