Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#31492 | 03/04/2016 4:57:56 pm | ||
buffmckagan Joined: 12/22/2013 Posts: 650 Scranton Bears Legends | I think it would be less confusing if under your team history's "Cup" column if it changed the way rounds are described. As opposed to "1rd," "2rds," 3rds", it could say "R128," "R64," R32," "R16," "QF," "SF" "CF/C2," "CW," etc. I don't know how many teams are left based on which round unless I have to sit down and really hash it out in my brain. I am not sure how easy this would be for Steve, but I would like to see other opinions on this. Am I the only one who thinks this? |
||
#31495 | 03/04/2016 5:58:32 pm | ||
xLee227 Joined: 07/06/2015 Posts: 269 Inactive | +1 I think the current naming is somewhat confusing as we just get told "X rounds" without much clarification how good that actually is | ||
#31498 | 03/04/2016 6:59:18 pm | ||
jreynoldson913 Joined: 08/18/2015 Posts: 293 Inactive | +1 | ||
#31504 | 03/04/2016 11:12:00 pm | ||
newtman Joined: 11/02/2013 Posts: 3343 Inactive | If it isn't too hard, it might be nice. | ||
#31553 | 03/07/2016 10:16:39 am | ||
admin Joined: 01/27/2010 Posts: 4981 Administrator | Hmm...I'll see what I can do. I'm just logging the rounds right now, but perhaps I can translate them to something like that. Steve |