Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#13170 | 01/05/2015 8:39:44 am | ||
Tiger504 Joined: 06/17/2014 Posts: 1314 Kalamazoo Bloody Tigers IV.7 | My research isn't exhaustive but... It seems to me that bot teams usually have sparse minor leagues and maybe don't even keep their minor leaguers at the right level...Maybe I think it would make these franchises a little more attractive to take over and be competitive if they were developing players. I understand if they are an economic disaster but still I think it might enhance the game. |
||
#13174 | 01/05/2015 10:07:46 am | ||
admin Joined: 01/27/2010 Posts: 4980 Administrator | Which teams are you looking at? Bot teams (assuming they're not in financial distress) try to keep a full big league team and minor league program. However, previous owners may have pursued a different strategy (which might have hurt the team). Steve |
||
#13177 | 01/05/2015 10:22:12 am | ||
Tiger504 Joined: 06/17/2014 Posts: 1314 Kalamazoo Bloody Tigers IV.7 | Steve, The financial distress thing probably explains it entirely but since we don't see other teams financials it was hard for me to tell. I can give you the Bloomington Braves as an example from my league. I'm just glad to hear that carrying a full roster is what you shoot for. I was not aware that was the case and makes my suggestion unnecessary. Thanks for the quick answer. Chuck |
||
#13178 | 01/05/2015 10:26:55 am | ||
admin Joined: 01/27/2010 Posts: 4980 Administrator | Actually, I think the state of the roster has more to do with the previous owner than financial issues.
Steve |