Post ID | Date & Time | Game Date | Function |
---|---|---|---|
#11986 | 11/19/2014 4:57:10 am | ||
Haselrig Joined: 04/13/2014 Posts: 2790 Novi Doubledays III.4 | Frank summed this up perfectly. It's one of the unique joys of Broken Bat that I've never encountered in another sports sim when you sweat out a minor leaguer only a handful of people have found and you see you got him. Big fist pump. Updated Wednesday, November 19 2014 @ 4:59:09 am PST |
||
#11987 | 11/19/2014 6:23:44 am | ||
the gizmo Joined: 02/07/2013 Posts: 574 Inactive | I prefer the randomness of players coming off waivers and will only slightly agree with OP on functionality of the FA search system What is possibility of: Including waiver claim deadline date on FA search results page and number of claims since lots of users are on phones and pads Adding a "remove claim" button on FA search page to help identify those players you have made claims on, though it is available on transactions page, as it is on each players page Adding button to identify players already viewed but no claim made. Then the sign column would progress like this since I belive most owners actually go to players page before signing an FA or placing a claim View>sign FA View>waiver claim>remove waiver claim Adding a checkbox/button to identify those players an owner viewed but is not interested in I do find it a bit annoying and redundant to keep looking at certain players I have no interest in Christmas is coming! Santa Steve? |
||
#12019 | 11/19/2014 8:47:56 pm | ||
MukilteoMike Joined: 08/09/2014 Posts: 3294 Inactive | Like all of those ideas, too. As I stated at the beginning, checking waivers is necessary. I don't like wasting time when the process could be improved. How many of you are using dial-up right now? And how many of you wash your clothes by hand? Humans are always looking for ways to minimize wasting time. I don't think it's unreasonable to apply that logic to waivers. |
||
#12025 | 11/20/2014 5:27:35 am | ||
newtman Joined: 11/02/2013 Posts: 3343 Inactive | This one I agree with... Why not have the option of showing all players that can be claimed in chronological order? I also agree with maybe a column that says that you viewed a player in the last couple of days. Of course depending on implementation this might require playing on the same device consistently which I currently don't do, spending half my time on my desktop and half on my laptop. |
||
#12029 | 11/20/2014 9:03:53 am | ||
LimelightPete Joined: 08/25/2014 Posts: 17 Inactive | What's wrong with dial-up? | ||
#12031 | 11/20/2014 1:37:54 pm | ||
the gizmo Joined: 02/07/2013 Posts: 574 Inactive | Dial-up? Is that a soda or body soap? |
||
#12041 | 11/20/2014 6:27:10 pm | ||
mduban4 Joined: 10/08/2013 Posts: 75 Inactive | What's unnecessary, though, is that you might review the same player for five or six days in a row. Others disappear in less than 48 hours, which is too quick in my opinion. Totally agree. Sifting through players that you've already sifted through in trying to make sure you don't miss seeing someone gone quicker than the others definitely is unnecessary. Though the joy of finding that great player outweighs looking through others multiple times, I don't see how anyone doesn't get that feeling like "I already saw you many times you terrible player why do you have to keep eating up my time?" I think either uniform waiver times so users could time their searches better or the chronological idea so users could check in every day and see who's up for grabs that day would reduce the annoyance without taking away the hard work. You'd still need to go through all the claims regularly to evaluate if you should put in for a player or not. |
||
#12079 | 11/21/2014 7:20:38 am | ||
Mig2012 Joined: 09/26/2012 Posts: 547 Inactive | Why not have the option of showing all players that can be claimed in chronological order? Just to give my support to this idea, after all I suggested this very same thing eons ago. |
||
#12083 | 11/21/2014 8:05:10 am | ||
Holmes Joined: 11/07/2013 Posts: 1175 Inactive | Yep, that clearly makes sense. | ||
#12195 | 11/26/2014 6:31:25 pm | ||
mduban4 Joined: 10/08/2013 Posts: 75 Inactive | Why not have the option of showing all players that can be claimed in chronological order? Steve, Would this be something reasonable programming-wise? |